1. Courts, Public Law and Regulatory Enforcement

1.1 Contempt of court and other offences and torts involving the administration of justice

In 2016, the Commission published its Issues Paper on Contempt of Court and Other Offences and Torts Involving the Administration of Justice (LRC IP 10-2016) (4th Programme of Law Reform, Project 4).

The issues paper examines offences involving the administration of justice, including the law of contempt of court, and takes account of recent developments in this area since the publication of the Commission’s 1994 Report on Contempt of Court (LRC 47-1994), which recommended that the common law rules on criminal contempt and civil contempt should be replaced with statutory provisions.

The issues paper also looks at the legal problems that can arise for journalists if they are asked to reveal the sources of their published material given that refusal by a witness in a court case to answer a relevant question can constitute contempt of court.   The European Court of Human Rights decision in 1996 in Goodwin v United Kingdom case that an order requiring the disclosure of a source could only be justified under the European Convention on Human Rights by “an overriding requirement in the public interest.” has been considered by the courts in Ireland on a number of occasions, but the law on disclosure of journalists sources remains unclear. The Issues Paper asks to what extent this could be clarified.

Finally, the issues paper also examines related offences and torts involving the administration of justice, including embracery (influencing or attempting to influence a juror), champerty (which involves a third party supporting litigation without just cause) and maintenance (where a third party supports litigation without just cause in return for a share of the proceeds). It asks whether it is appropriate to retain these crimes and torts and whether there is a case for their regulation.

1.2 Reform of Non-court adjudicative bodies and appeals to courts

In 2019 the Commission began work on its project concerning the reform of non-court adjudicative bodies and appeals to courts (5th Programme of Law Reform, Project 1).

As with most jurisdictions, Ireland now has a great array of quasi-judicial bodies empowered, usually by legislation, to adjudicate issues and disputes in particular areas. They include An Bord Pleanála, the International Protection Appeals Tribunal, the Residential Tenancies Board and the Social Welfare Appeals Office.

The profusion of such adjudicative bodies is inevitable in the modern administrative state, but they have grown up over many decades on a case-by-case basis, without any standard

approach to procedural matters or their relationship with the courts, including by way of

appeal or review.

The Commission noted in its 2016 Report on Consolidation and Reform of Aspects of the Law of Evidence the varying procedures and

rules of evidence among quasi-judicial bodies[1]. A number of submissions received during the consultation process for this Fifth Programme have drawn attention to the great multiplicity of avenues of appeal from these bodies, and the confusion that this generates. Questions pertaining to related issues, such as the standard of proof to be applied, and access to legal representation, may also be examined.

This project will therefore examine the case for a reformed system, including the approach to evidential matters and simplifying the avenues of appeal to the courts from such bodies. The Commission notes that significant reforms have been enacted in the UK in the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, which implemented the majority of the recommendations in the 2001 Leggatt Report[2]. The 2007 Act lays down a single basis for appeals from the quasi-judicial bodies within its scope, and the project will examine to what extent this may be a useful reform model for this jurisdiction. The Commission is conscious that other aspects of the reforms in the UK 2007 Act, notably the consolidation of the various bodies into a single tribunal structure with uniform powers and procedures, may present constitutional questions in Ireland under Articles 34 and 37. The Commission will have regard to these important questions in developing the project, and will also review relevant reforms in jurisdictions other than the UK.


[2] Sir Andrew Leggatt, Tribunals for Users: One System, One Service (2001)

1.3 A Regulatory Framework for Adult Safegaurding

In 2019, the Commission published its Issues Paper on A Regulatory Framework for Adult Safeguarding (LRC IP 18-2019) (5th Programme of Law Reform, Project 2).

In a Seanad debate on a Private Member’s Bill, the Adult Safeguarding Bill 2017, the Minister for Health stated that the Government agreed that there was a need for an appropriate statutory framework for the safeguarding of vulnerable or at-risk adults. The Department of Health and a number of other bodies also made detailed submissions requesting the Commission to include this matter in the Fifth Programme.

The Commission has previously completed work in this general area, including the 2006 report which recommended the replacement of the adult wardship system with legislation on adult capacity based on a functional test of capacity, largely reflected in the Assisted Decision- Making (Capacity) Act 2015.

This Issues Paper considers a range of possible regulatory models for adult safeguarding, such as the body or bodies who should regulate adult safeguarding, which could include existing regulatory bodies. It seeks the public’s views on the powers of such a body or bodies, the need for multi-agency coordination and collaboration and the rights-based guiding principles that should apply.

The 11 key issues that arise in this project and on which the Commission is seeking the views of the public are:

  1. Guiding principles
  2. Defining key terms
  3. Defining abuse and neglect
  4. Financial abuse
  5. Body or bodies to regulate adult safeguarding
  6. Powers of entry and inspection
  7. Investigative powers, including barring and protection orders
  8. Reporting obligations
  9. Advocacy service
  10. Access to sensitive data
  11. Multi-agency coordination and collaboration

Back to list of current projects